Community Meeting on 3801 Liberty Ave.
4.15.16 Update
LU and LC jointly sent the following letter to the Zoning Board of Adjustment regarding the development proposed, expressing conditional support.
Similar Posts
Development Updates | Front page posts | Responsible Development | Responsible Hospitality | Responsible Planning
Recap of Community Development Activities Meeting on Liquor License Application at 4609 Butler St (to be Lawrence Hall)
LH Hospitality Co. has applied for a liquor license at 4609 Butler St. The site is set to be named Lawrence Hall. As part of LU & LC’s community process, a Community Development Activities Meeting (CDAM) was held for LH Hospitality Co. to present their plans to the community on Thursday, 5/25 at 5:30 PM…
Nominations open for Neighbor of the Year and Outstanding Community Partner!
Make your nominations now for Neighbor of the Year and Outstanding Community Partner for 2017. Recipients of the award will be recognized at LIVE! in Lawrenceville, Lawrenceville United’s annual fundraiser. For more information about LIVE!, check out our Facebook event listing or buy your tickets on Eventbrite. Neighbor of the Year The Neighbor of the…
The Goldmark (formerly Salud)
5.15.15 A meeting was held at the Boys and Girls Club on May 13th for Adam Kulik and Nicole Billitto to present their plans for The Gold Mark (formerly Salud). The Gold Mark is a proposed bar that will serve traditional and craft beer and cocktails ($3-$10) along with a limited food menu of classic…
Community | Development Updates | Front page posts | News | Responsible Development | Responsible Planning
Update: off-street parking requirements for rowhouse neighborhoods
In March, Mayor Peduto introduced zoning text amendments with a goal of “improving pedestrian safety, enhancing neighborhood walkability, and promoting non-vehicular mobility.” Under this proposed legislation, minimum parking requirements would be reduced from 1 to 0 in R1A (residential, single-family attached AKA rowhouse) neighborhoods like Lawrenceville. Maximum parking requirements would remain the same (4). For more…